If you are thinking about conducting a research project with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples or communities, the design of your project must respect and take into account the values, and cultural protocols of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. As such there are additional considerations for research projects that:
- Involve or will be conducted in or with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities
- Uses data related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples that is not otherwise publically available
- Targets participants who are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people/s
- The recruitment population is likely to include a significant number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, i.e. health population studies, certain school populations
Research life cycle
Guidelines for adhering to ethical conduct
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) NHMRC - Ethical guidelines for research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples guides researchers in the conception, design, and conduct of research. This document outlines six key values that demonstrate that ethical research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities requires more than adherence to the legal requirements of guidelines. All research projects must incorporate these six values, and researchers should also be aware of any Western research norms or assumptions that may unintentionally lead to culturally insensitive research practices.
Ethical research is founded on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural value systems. Accordingly, unethical research behaviour can arise from the failure to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander value systems. Unethical research behaviour can also arise from the prioritising of the researchers’ own value system over Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural value systems. Either practice reduces research validity and causes real-life harm to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
The Guidance for the Six Values Table provides a description of the key aspects of each of the six values, accompanied by a set of positive research practice examples linked to the achievement of each value within research. Box 1 in the PDF includes problematic research practices that have been shown to increase the likelihood that a research project will not meet ethical guidelines.
Research projects vary in purpose, design, data source/type and analytical processes. The positive research practices linked to the descriptions of the six values of the NHMRC in the PDF below therefore are not going to be applicable to all research projects. The intent in guidance provided in the PDF is not to set hard rules, but to provide examples of high quality practices and processes.

Six values
- Spirit and Integrity
- Reciprocity
- Respect
- Equity
- Responsibility
- Cultural Continuity
The figure shows how these values combine to form a holistic approach to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander related research.
Diagram 1 from Ethical guidelines for research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Note: The terms Aboriginal, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Indigenous are used alternately. Aboriginal reflects that most Indigenous people in Tasmania are Tasmanian Aborigines. Indigenous and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander reflects the welcome presence of other Indigenous people at the University.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander involvement in the Research
When the views and cultural, values, beliefs and practices of researchers and participants differ there is potential for miscommunication, misunderstanding and breach of cultural protocols. For this reason it is strongly recommended that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research always has significant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander input into the research design and the processes of the research project.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research that does not include substantial Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research and/or governance involvement would need to provide a valid explanation for the absence in the project’s ethics application. As a caution it needs to be noted that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander inclusion does not negate the responsibilities of the non-Indigenous researchers to be culturally competent and responsible for their own cultural/protocol learnings. Researchers cannot abrogate responsibility for ensuring their own cultural competence or for producing culturally responsible and culturally sensitive and safe research by the mere inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the research team.
Common ways that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander involvement is demonstrated are listed below. Good ethical research practice may include a number of these.
When planning the study you must ensure that the roles and responsibilities of the members of the research team are appropriate and defined, for example, ensure that:
- Clearly defined responsibilities and level of involvement of all parties is documented and signed off by all parties;
- The Chief Investigator, Cultural Broker, Cultural Mentor or Reference group are consulted about relevant world views, cultural values, beliefs and protocols in the development of the research proposal;
- There is appropriate payment and/or workload recognition and acknowledgement in reports, presentations and publications of those involved in the project; and,
- Regular meetings are scheduled, held, and minuted.
Community engagement
For community engagement projects, always discuss your community engagement plans with the Riawunna Centre for Aboriginal Education. Riawunna staff can provide advice to researchers on how community relationships might be developed and the most appropriate organisational contacts.
Note: It is not the role of Riawunna staff to broker relationships with community groups or organisations on behalf of researchers or those undertaking community engagement projects. Initiation and building of relationships must always remain the responsibility of those undertaking the community engagement or research project.
Indigenous data sovereignty
Indigenous data sovereignty, in keeping with the six values, requires that data related to Indigenous peoples should be subject to the laws/governance of those peoples. Indigenous data sovereignty:
- Asserts Indigenous rights and interests in relation to data
- Ensures Indigenous data are safeguarded and protected
- Ensures quality/integrity of Indigenous data and collection
- Advocates for Indigenous involvement in governance of data repositories
- Asserts Indigenous rights in relation to decisions about collection of, and access to, Indigenous data
Indigenous data sovereignty applies to projects that use data relating to and about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people/s. When using secondary data in research it is essential that Indigenous data sovereignty is protected by maintaining the consent requirements and restrictions placed on the data when it was originally collected.
Go to more information about Indigenous data sovereignty in Australia, including key principles at MnW Principles — Maiam Nayri Wingara.